The Bush and Blair Folly in Iraq
Chatham
House, the respectable London think tank, concluded in August 2006: “The greatest
problem facing the U.S. is that Iran has superseded it as the most influential
power in Iraq”.
It was
inevitable that the 2003 occupation of Iraq would hand Southern Iraq and the
Baghdad government to Tehran regardless of whether the U.S. increased the level
of its military power in Iraq or withdrew completely (as it did in December
2011); whether the Democrats or the Republicans control the White House and/or
Capitol Hill, and regardless of whether Iraq emerges from the chaos created by
the occupation as a single entity, a federal republic, or broken-up into three
states.
The occupation of Iraq opened the gates of hell in the Middle East and the Muslim world. It has set in motion events that make it difficult to
predict how lifting the lid on Iraq’s sectarian and ethnic tensions could lead
to anything but to Iranian domination over Iraq, to Shiite emboldenment
everywhere, and to endless long-term Shiite/Sunni conflicts spilling rivers of
blood and breeding hoards of jihadists in the East and the West until the Sunni leaders in the region
would either accept Iran’s hegemony or succeed in stopping the march of Shiism.
Western inaction
since the start of the March 2011 popular revolution in Syria allowed the Asad
regime to transform a peaceful uprising against tyranny into a regional
existential conflagration between Alawites and Shi'ites from Iran, Iraq and
Hezbollah, on one hand, and Sunnis, on the other. It deepened the enmity
between Shi’ites and Sunnis and sharpened their fighting capabilities,
particularly ISIS.
The American excuse to starve the Syrian revolution of effective
weapons for fear of falling into the hands of terrorists was turned on its head
when ISIS captured from the Iraqi army in Mosul a huge inventory of sophisticated American weapons, along with a few hundred million dollars.
|