On October 3, 2010 the
President of Syria appointed a new Minister of Irrigation. I would like to take
this opportunity to advocate that Syria’s Ministry of Irrigation should be
abolished and its functions transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture. As long
as irrigation politics is accorded a ministerial voice, investment in
irrigation schemes will continue to waste Syria’s modest scarce resources.
Spending on irrigation over the past
five decades has been substantial but inefficient. Land reclamation cost was
high, estimated at $25,700 per hectare. At such cost, it would be practically
impossible to make a reasonable rate of return.
The Tabqa Dam has failed to achieve its
targets. The plan was to increase by 2000 the irrigated surface in the
Euphrates Basin by 640,000 hectares. By 2000, only 124,000 hectares, or 19
percent of the target had been achieved in this salt-affected and drainage-poor
Basin---gypsum in the soil caused the irrigation networks to collapse. In the
Euphrates Basin 43 percent of the land was identified by the World Bank as
having drainage problems or potential to develop problems in the future.
The Tabqa Dam wastes a huge volume of
water to evaporation, estimated at 1.6 billion m3 annually. To put this figure
in perspective, it is theoretically adequate to meet the drinking and household
water needs of Syria's 22 million inhabitants. Put differently, 1.6 billion m3 of
water is equivalent to almost 25% of Syria’s share of the waters from Euphrates
River.
There are other unimpressive results
from Syria’s obsession with irrigation projects. The migration from rural
communities to urban centers did not slow down. The ratio of rural to total
population has even declined since 1961, from 63 percent to 48 percent in 2000,
where it probably stands today. Reliance on capricious rainfall was not reduced
either. In 1989, wheat production was 1 million tons; in 1995, it jumped to 4.2
million tons; in 1999, it dropped to 2.7 million tons; in 2007, it increased to
4.5 million tons,and in 2008 it was around 2.5 million tons.
Food independence is impossible for a
country like Syria to achieve. With 22-million population Syria requires about
22 billion m3 of water annually to grow its food needs. Syria can provide only
15 billion m3 from irrigation and rain combined. The difference is being
imported in the form of foodstuffs quietly without fanfare. The gap will get
bigger as Syria's population grows.Coupled
with Syria's narrow GDP diversification and dearth in foreign currency sources from
exports, food imports will grow increasingly difficult to afford.
Over-extraction
of groundwater has deteriorated Syria's environment seriously. Irrigation
extractions beyond the volume of renewable water have led to negative balances
in five out the country's seven basins,thus reducing the quantity
and degrading the quality of the remaining water reserves.Eventually, with continued water
over-extraction, irrigated lands will be abandoned, investments written off,
and food production halted. Whenever this happens, the negative impact on rural
communities and societal order could be shattering.
The World Bank concluded that Syria's
government "will need to recognize that achieving food security with respect
to wheat and other cereals in the short-term as well as the encouragement of
water-intensive cotton appear to be undermining Syria's security over the
long-term by depleting available groundwater resources." Insufficient water resources
and a rapidly growing population create insurmountable challenges for sustained
food self-sufficiency with cotton growing. There simply is not enough water for
both.
You can bring water and money and make
the desert bloom, until either the water or the money runs out.
Under Syria’s arid and semi-arid conditions an economist
would argue that it would be beneficial to import foodstuffs instead of
investing in financially and environmentally non-viable local irrigation
schemes. An economist would also argue that agriculture in Syria should be left
to rain-fed lands with investments limited to improving crop yield, decided on a purely economic
rate of return basis. Three quarters of Syria’s
almost five million hectares in cropped area is rain-fed.
Syria would be better off beginning to
focus its efforts on investment in export industries in order to generate
sufficient foreign currencies to buy food in the future instead of continuing
to invest in white elephant irrigation schemes.
For these reasons, Syria’s Ministry of
Irrigation should be abolished.